Minimally Supervised Novel Relation Development Using Latent Relational Mapping: A Survey

SEEE DIGIBOOK ON ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 01 (2), JUN 2020 PP. (1044-1058)
Abstract– On the World Wide Web, one can locate a wide variety of distinct sorts of semantic entities as well as relationships between those entities. The procedure of relation extraction is a phase that is necessary in a wide range of activities that are associated with the World Wide Web. Some examples of these activities include information retrieval (IR), the extraction of information, and the extraction of social networks. If a supervised relation extraction system has been trained to extract a particular relation type (source relation), but that system has not been trained to extract a novel relation type (target relation), then it is possible that the novel relation type will not be extracted accurately by the system. On the other hand, manually preparing training data for each new relation type that could be obtained is a procedure that is both time-consuming and expensive. We offer a strategy for updating an existing relation extraction system so that it can automatically extract a variety of relations, and we do so by providing a mechanism. Our suggested method is comprised of two processes: first, learning a lower dimensional projections between the different relations, and then, learning a relational classifiers for the target relation type by picking examples. Together, these make up the proposed method. The learning process is included in both of these stages. In order to begin, in order to provide a description of the semantic link between two entities, we must first extract lexical and syntactic patterns from situations in which they occur together. This is necessary in order to provide a description of the semantic connection. After that, a bipartite graph is constructed between relation-specific patterns (RS) and relation-independent patterns. RS stands for relation-specific pattern (RI). The process of spectral clustering has to come first in order for the bipartite network to be used in the generation of a lower-dimensional projection. Following this, we train a classifier for the target relation type by making use of a very limited number of samples that have been tagged. In order to compensate for the dearth of examples of target relation training, we have devised a method of under sampling that only considers one side. We use a data set that consists of 2,000 examples of each of 20 different relation types in order to assess how efficient the strategy that was presented is. The results of our tests indicate that the strategy that was suggested is effective in producing a macro average F-score that is statistically significant at the level of 62.77. In addition, this method are tested for email spam comments detection and figured that the process needs more datasets to convince even normal outcome.
Index Terms – Supervised; Mapping; Latent; Supervised model relations
REFERENCE

[1] Bollegala, D., Matsuo, Y., & Ishizuka, M. (2011). Minimally supervised novel relation extraction using a latent relational mapping. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(2), 419-432.
[2] Nayak, T., Majumder, N., Goyal, P., & Poria, S. (2021). Deep neural approaches to relation triplets extraction: A comprehensive survey. Cognitive Computation, 13(5), 1215-1232.
[3] Sapate, M. P., & Singh, S. T. Improved Method for Relation Adaptation to Extract the New Relations Efficiently from Relational Mapping.
[4] Pawar, S., Palshikar, G. K., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2017). Relation extraction: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05191.
[5] Nguyen, D. Q., & Verspoor, K. (2019, April). End- to-end neural relation extraction using deep biaffine attention. In European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 729-738). Springer, Cham.
[6] Zhang, X., Liu, T., Li, P., Jia, W., & Zhao, H. (2020). Robust neural relation extraction via multi-granularity noises reduction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(9), 3297-3310.
[7] Zhao, X., Yang, M., Qu, Q., Xu, R., & Li, J. (2022). Exploring Privileged Features for Relation Extraction with Contrastive Student-Teacher Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[8] Li, J., Huang, G., Chen, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). Dual CNN for relation extraction with knowledge-based attention and word embeddings. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2019.
[9] Liu, K., & El-Gohary, N. (2017). Ontology-based semi-supervised conditional random fields for automated information extraction from bridge inspection reports. Automation in construction, 81, 313-327.


Dr.S. Dhanabal, Gayathiri S, Gayathiri V, Sangeetha P, Saranaa S
Department of Information Technology,
Rathinam Technical Campus, Coimbatore, India

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top