SECURITY OF DATA IN CLOUD STORAGE THROUGH FULL HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION

SEEE DIGIBOOK ON ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 03, JAN 2023 PP. (89-92)
Abstract– In this letter, we examine the issue of tracking distributed targets when there is dispute regarding the relationships between data and targets. At least one well-known method that employs the least squared error (MMSE) approach has been developed in response to the challenge of link prediction. In the presence of several detectors, the computed covariance of the median outlook has a possibility of becoming non-positive and semi-definite. As a result, it is inapplicable to some simulations, as it cannot be executed in these circumstances. We design a novel distributed method that use the maximum a posteriori (MAP) strategy to manage the data association procedure. This method is employed to address the data association procedure. The innovative method has the ability to ensure that the computed correlations of the global estimate are positive and semi-definite in every simulation. This index includes concepts such as data association uncertainty, distributed estimation, target tracking, and wireless sensor networks.
REFERENCE

1. Lin, J., Xiao, W., Lewis, F. L., & Xie, L. (2008). Energy-efficient distributed adaptive multisensor scheduling for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 58(6), 1886-1896.
2. Lersteau, C., Rossi, A., & Sevaux, M. (2016). Robust scheduling of wireless sensor networks for target tracking under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 252(2), 407-417..
3. Li, Z., Zhang, L., Cai, Y., & Ochiai, H. (2021). Sensor Selection for Maneuvering Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks With Uncertainty. IEEE Sensors Journal.
4. Zhang, D., Liu, M., & Zhang, S. (2016, July). Node selection for target tracking in UWSNs under measurement origin uncertainty. In 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (pp. 5154-5159). IEEE.
5. Veeravalli, V. V., & Varshney, P. K. (2012). Distributed inference in wireless sensor networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1958), 100-117.
6. Savic, V., Wymeersch, H., & Zazo, S. (2014). Belief consensus algorithms for fast distributed target tracking in wireless sensor networks. Signal Processing, 95, 149-160.
7. Ong, L. L., Bailey, T., Durrant-Whyte, H., & Upcroft, B. (2008, June). Decentralised particle filtering for multiple target tracking in wireless sensor networks. In 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
8. Sun, Y., Yuan, Y., Li, X., Xu, Q., & Guan, X. (2018). An adaptive sampling algorithm for target tracking in underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 68324-68336.
9. Panta, K., Clark, D. E., & Vo, B. N. (2009). Data association and track management for the Gaussian mixture probability hypothesis density filter. IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, 45(3), 1003-1016.
10. Ponsudha, S. P., Priya, R. L., & Edward, L. J. (2011). A Comprehensive Review on Energy Conserved Multi-object Tracking over Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Computer Applications, 23(2).

Madan A Sendhil, Ganeshkumar G, Shanthi S
Rathinam Technical Campus,
Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top